Dueling Dogma

This might drive home how slippery a subject probability is. Warning... anyone not terribly interested in the finer points of how probabilit...

Interesting point I saw raised a while back by one of the readers at Andrew Sullivan's blog, which has since been percolating in the bac...

(I'm flirting with starting a running "people don't understand..." theme on the blog, considering the endless supply of to...

Chromosome Fusions A lot of animals have different numbers of chromosomes. An often raised objection to evolution is that this means at s...

Previously we skimmed over the creation of a phylogenetic tree with a simplified example of how they are constructed using only a few major...

Alright… so we’ve covered radiometric dating and why it’s considered reliable, the geologic column and the fossil record conforming to ove...

This is one of the most fundamental concepts which need to be understood if you want to properly grasp the evidence for evolution. It desc...

Having covered  in posts 1 and 2 why radiometric dating is considered reliable, how the geologic column appears, and how the cross correlati...

When the geologic column was first being mapped out by geologists they could only establish relative dates of the position of formation of a...

First, a note on the title of the series of posts. Science does NOT "prove" things. Anything. Ever. (No, really... not anything )....